On Sunday Court to Songkhla. And the article from court I repeated the

In essence, that is "Human conflict trap .... I thought that ...".

1. The man is a realist who held it. The fact that the pristine The man himself is the limit in terms of recognition. So looking at the same thing, But the difference in the points standing. In a different time. It may look the same. I see things differently

2. Humans can take a self-centered world. That means seizing everything they think they are doing themselves heard. I do think it's right to say what does not correspond to their hearts. Or contrary to their It was wrong or evil. The fact Some ideas are not the stereotype that's right or wrong, because the idea of ​​the individual. Was echoed by education, training, experience, character empirical attitude at that time.

3. Choose a man is not impaired. Mistakes of others By overlook their own shortcomings. Or even see their own shortcomings, concealed the cause of all disputes. Often caused by a combination of impairments. The most common criticism of each other (more or less depending on the case) and the real benefits. It is to learn a lesson for the future. Do not let what happened. Passed by waste

4. humans are thought to differ. Which reflects the character of the educational experience, empirical attitude at that time. And trying to get others to accept their ideas. But I do not accept that others have the right to think of themselves as well.

5. There is a limit of human ability to communicate. And often do not have the patience or trying to communicate successfully. When tolerance ends Man chose to use violence. Both the tone and phrasing is used in the end. (These are but a way to overcome all of the Beast).

6. human weaknesses The ability to listen to the facts. Like humans choose to believe because the speaker is relative, a loved one who knows. Or a person who makes satisfaction. Although he has not seen. Does not recognize the fact Do not abuse the information they have heard it in its entirety. But he chose to believe it. Ignoring logic and reason opponent. Or if you are addicted to the fact that he possesses in the next inning, chose to vent their anger. Vent anger at the abuse came to a sudden. Even then, he might have drugs that increase. Keeping in mind the answer to. He tried not to talk about. Do not go back and fix mistakes or learn about hearing the facts. And events like this over and over again.

7. When the men found any facts. The other parties expressed the Does not meet the real (not the truth. It is true that held true or pure time) he would deny the fact that every other show afterwards. And decided that everything is not all true. Which turned out to be too extreme (because, in fact. The logic is needed to digest that. In what way he expressed it. It is logical or not).

8. humans often begin interact with negligence. The agreement followed so lax. Slow and weak Because of the lack of security that would bring conflicts to come (just to meet their needs quickly), and when there are some facts that have never been interpreted or check the details first. Human interpretation items that will occur. Benefit to themselves or their department. (As a matter of human nature Rights of selfishness Or favor them), and finally there was a dispute.

9. man transformed himself from a victim into the accused. Transforming himself from an advantage as a disadvantage. It leads to anger and false logic. Even though he thought again. When anger is vented out of the chaos to create life. But he also chose to overlook it. And speak only what he advantage (that is to say, but the fault of the other party).

10. man ready to forgive Give yourself a chance, relatives, acquaintances, or even to anyone on the planet. That may have made a mistake. But he would not allow even a single chance to the people who are their parties.

11. When people have a negative attitude towards any party then. To overlook the necessity of reason or the other. If he is in a situation like that. You may do the same.

If I go back to court again. I bring you a list of judges. The authors come down to me again.

                            sirapop chotitytanakul (lawyer)